Lie # 3 "CO2 Is Deadly To Life On Earth!"
    For the last six decades, the "Climate Industrial Complex" has documented an increase of 1 CO2 molecule in 10,000 molecules of air.  Based on this somewhat questionable data thousands of members of the "Climate Industrial Complex" have become very wealthy getting Government grants while preaching the Earth will soon become unlivable for humans, therefore governments must outlaw fueled vehicles.

Is CO2 Going To Doom Earth?
    On the other side of this argument are thousands of biologists who have noted that if greenhouse CO2 content gets below 1 molecule per 6,000 molecules of air plants die, and without plants, Earth would become a dead planet! 

The World's Top Climate Experts Exposed for Fabricating Data!
    In the fall of 2009 several of the world's leading "Climate Experts" were caught up in the famous "Climategate" scandal.  The scandal involved hundreds of hacked email messages between some of the richest and most outspoken leaders of the so-called "Climate Industrial Complex".  These emails clearly revealed that these developers of thousands of data points for historic CO2 levels had conspired to fake massive amounts of their  "historic" temperature and CO2 data to fit their claims that atmospheric CO2 was historically very low.  These historic estimates were shaped from examining the tree rings of a few bristlecone and foxtail pines trees in the Western United States, and a few other locations.  Biologists note that tree ring width normally indicates the amount of water a tree receives not its temperature.   Any temperature of CO2 data history based on the tree ring width from a few trees in one or two areas would be about as meaningful as reading tea leaves.

Water Vapor Is A Far More Active Greenhouse Gas 
   paper by Ahilleas Maurellis and Jonathan Tennyson, cited below, called water vapor "the most vital molecule in our atmosphere, yet it is rarely discussed. Indeed, water barely rates a mention in the hundreds of pages of the 2001 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change."  Why are water vapor and clouds not considered in any Climate Models, when water molecules are frequently 100 times more plentiful in the world's atmosphere and have a far greater greenhouse effect than CO2?    Could it be a fear of offending the commercial sector that pumps billions of tons of water vapor into Earth's atmosphere every day, the world's electric utilities?  This same sector adds 70% of the heat energy used to power their massive heat engines directly into Earth's atmosphere, directly causing global warming.  (Thermal Pollution) 

Driving BEVs Increases Deadly Gases In Earth's Atmosphere.
   When BEVs recharge from the grid they become directly responsible for emitting not just CO2 but several cancer-causing gasses, and caustic acids, produced by the grid's large steam or gas turbine heat engines.
This is not a significant issue with internal combustion-powered vehicles.
What motivates regulators and lawmakers to want to force people into BEVs against their will when their energy source is so damaging to people's health and the climate?  Clearly, the most dangerous "Climate Feedback loop" is the one that moves trillions of dollars coming out of the pockets of taxpayers into the pockets of members of the Climate Industrial Complex.

BEVs Greatest Emissions Of CO2 Happens When They're Made!
     In 2017, a Swedish government study looked at how much CO2 is emitted by the making of BEV battery packs of different sizes. The study found that the extraction, transportation, and production of EV batteries released between 254 kg and 270 kg of CO2/kWh into the planet's atmosphere.  A BEV with a 100 kWh battery is responsible for more CO2 emissions than 10,000 liters of gasoline before it leaves the factory.   This is equivalent to the fuel used to drive a Toyota Camry well over 80,000 km. see:  A Kamtech REEV would be responsible for a fraction of the CO2 emitted by a BEV, and less water vapor.  Kamtech also uses Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition which allows for very lean burn, at lower temperatures.  See Exhibit section.